All Projects | wbTeamPro | wbTimeLog |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-03-28 07:59 EST |
Dashboard | Features | Bugs | Report Issue | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ 1 Vote ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0010373 | wbTeamPro | [All Projects] Bugs | public | 2017-01-30 09:31 | 2015-01-25 00:00 | ||||
Reporter | a104 | ||||||||
Assigned To | webuddha | ||||||||
Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | Resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | v3.0.32 | ||||||||
Target Version | Applied to Version | v3.0.33 | |||||||
Summary | 0010373: Cannot invoice timelogs | ||||||||
Description | Everytime I go in the project timelog and click on the invoice icon, I fill out the form as I have always done, and I get the following errors: 1st Popup: No parameters supplied to update the invoice 2nd Popup The Timelog Invoice(s) have been created Successfully In the end, the entry is added to the invoice but no invoice number is assigned to the timelog. Please review. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attached Files |
Notes | |
(0010116) webuddha (administrator) 2014-03-17 13:32 |
We have duplicated the error, which only occurs when updating an existing invoice. We are preparing a solution now. |
(0010117) a104 (reporter) 2014-03-17 13:37 |
This is great news. Thanks |
(0010118) webuddha (administrator) 2014-03-17 13:46 |
WHMCS Changed the requirements for the updateinvoice LocalAPI request, which now requires that the "date" be passed. During an update operation wbTeamPro is only passing new line item data, not affecting the existing invoice date or any other values. This is believed to be a glitch within WHMCS as it is not listed in the changelogs or API specifications. Regardless wbTeamPro has been updated to pass the existing invoice date to the LocalAPI request to satisfy the requirement. Testing shows the operation is now working as before. |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2014-03-14 11:51 | a104 | New Issue | |
2014-03-14 11:51 | a104 | ||
2014-03-17 13:32 | webuddha | Note Added: 0010116 | |
2014-03-17 13:32 | webuddha | Assigned To | => webuddha |
2014-03-17 13:32 | webuddha | Status | New => Under Review |
2014-03-17 13:37 | a104 | Note Added: 0010117 | |
2014-03-17 13:46 | webuddha | Note Added: 0010118 | |
2014-03-17 13:46 | webuddha | Status | Under Review => Resolved |
2014-03-17 13:46 | webuddha | Applied to Version | => v3.0.33 |
2014-03-17 13:46 | webuddha | Resolution | open => fixed |
Dashboard | Features | Bugs | Report Issue | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | My Account |
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |